| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 |
81. The Future of Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Funky Lazers wrote: Zimmy Zeta wrote: If 90% of the wars currently just drive players away, then there is a serious issue that needs to be fixed. Sure thing. I don't give a ship about PvP. I don't want to have any interaction with any nul...
- by Singular Snowflake - at 2013.01.18 13:19:00
|
82. The Future of Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Solomon wrote: Firstly, let me state clearly that there are no plans to change the war declaration mechanic into a system that caters to mutual high sec pvp only. Secondly, the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the corners...
- by Singular Snowflake - at 2013.01.18 11:48:00
|
83. The Future of Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cannibal Kane wrote: Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote: Cannibal Kane wrote: It is CSM talking about Highsec wars again when they them self know fuckall about it. Only one solution! James 315 for CSM 8! Really? He is the wrong person for C...
- by Singular Snowflake - at 2013.01.17 16:26:00
|
84. The Future of Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Andreus Ixiris wrote: Singular Snowflake wrote: Now, now. I firmly believe that CCP will listen to the playerbase before making these kinds of gamebreaking decisions. Now it is our duty to voice our opinions about the proposed hellokitty-dir...
- by Singular Snowflake - at 2013.01.17 15:22:00
|
85. The Future of Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
anthie wrote: Why............... just why would we want another EQ clone ? Not talking WoW here since EQ was the first true themepark based MMO, and now you wan't to bring the same sort of "duel" concept to Eve , jesus christ, that is somethin...
- by Singular Snowflake - at 2013.01.17 14:59:00
|
86. The Future of Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
bongsmoke wrote: OP, sounds like your disappointed CCP doesn't tie up victims in hi-sec just for you. I came here expecting one sided argument, left with expectations intact. Sir, looking at the thread it seems clear that the idea of helloki...
- by Singular Snowflake - at 2013.01.17 14:16:00
|
87. The Future of Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Andreus Ixiris wrote: They are discussing problems intrinsic to EVE Online's mechanics and culture, which is that 90% of the time, hi-sec wardecs don't go anywhere . The number you are looking for is: CCP Solomon wrote: Solomon wagered th...
- by Singular Snowflake - at 2013.01.17 12:06:00
|
88. The Future of Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Morrigan LeSante wrote: You miss the point, I think . I may be wrong I read that as as "people who dont want to fight wont, so what's the actual point?" I mean, setting aside the possibility of economic warfare because it's a) thin and b) on...
- by Singular Snowflake - at 2013.01.17 08:25:00
|
89. The Future of Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Wrangler wrote: EVE isn't designed to just look like a cold, dark and harsh world, it's designed to be a cold, dark and harsh world. I have subscribed to EVE with the belief that the above statement has always been one of the core values...
- by Singular Snowflake - at 2013.01.17 08:04:00
|
90. Collective front launched against the New Order, James315 and miner bumping. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
KillaMcgee wrote: or you can just pay up and ignore the advice... or fit a thrasher and help the cause... just sayin' Getting the mining permit is indeed the cheapest and safest tank there is and it does not even require you to train any sk...
- by Singular Snowflake - at 2013.01.16 20:20:00
|
91. Collective front launched against the New Order, James315 and miner bumping. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Emperor Crash Zues wrote: ah except for the fact that your the ones's saying they are criminals to begin with. Therefore the burden of proof lies with you and your people to prove your so called just cause. And another thing why should we conf...
- by Singular Snowflake - at 2013.01.16 18:33:00
|
92. Collective front launched against the New Order, James315 and miner bumping. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Emperor Crash Zues wrote: I would like to see this proof of all this as I'm sure others would as well. Maybe we would be more willing to accept your actions if you actually provided proof for once. All we have seen are wrecks of comrades and i...
- by Singular Snowflake - at 2013.01.16 14:36:00
|
93. Collective front launched against the New Order, James315 and miner bumping. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Emperor Crash Zues wrote: Yea me and several other miners were going round and round about this whole whole mining thing and frankly the new order agent made the new order sound more cultish then anything I've ever heard in RL. Me and my pe...
- by Singular Snowflake - at 2013.01.15 13:55:00
|
94. Collective front launched against the New Order, James315 and miner bumping. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I could not see the five reds on overview. I mined AFK.
- by Singular Snowflake - at 2013.01.15 09:12:00
|
95. Collective front launched against the New Order, James315 and miner bumping. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Emperor Crash Zues wrote: I have been reading through these minebumping forums and i don't agree with bumping miners regardles if there afk or not. I believe everyone should be able to play as they wish. However that being said this game is s...
- by Singular Snowflake - at 2013.01.15 03:06:00
|
96. Hi Sec Miners are Robbers, Miner Gankers / Bumpers are the Cops - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Natsett Amuinn wrote: silens vesica wrote: Natsett Amuinn wrote: Keep telling the OP he's an idiot for pointing out that miners drive down the cost of minerals by overmining. CCP TOLD US THEY ARE YOU TOOLS! And we don't really car...
- by Singular Snowflake - at 2013.01.14 16:13:00
|
97. Collective front launched against the New Order, James315 and miner bumping. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Agent Eunoli wrote: Hey guys, I found a new site online! Please check it out at: http://noneworderineve.com/ I know it's not much to look at yet but it's a start and it is being worked on. That site is a shining beacon in the vastness of...
- by Singular Snowflake - at 2013.01.14 07:02:00
|
98. James315 isnt going far enough - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Mira Robinson wrote: Five Hulkageddons plus a 'permanent' one did nothing Mira Robinson wrote: Let me bring up Hulkageddon. Now that was a ganking event. Perhaps you should post some more, you are not clearly getting the attention...
- by Singular Snowflake - at 2013.01.12 20:23:00
|
99. James315 isnt going far enough - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Mira Robinson wrote: That's the difference. That is why I will not adhere to New Order logic. I will absolutely acknowledge them and what they are doing in-game. Due to emergent gameplay, I must. But I will never respect it, in it's current ...
- by Singular Snowflake - at 2013.01.12 17:52:00
|
100. James315 isnt going far enough - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Mira Robinson wrote: I never said I was AFK mining. I have never been successfully ganked in a belt. The fact that you are not just targeting AFK miners, but also miners who do not buy a worthless permit, you are extorting them. That's not...
- by Singular Snowflake - at 2013.01.11 06:30:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |